| 张艳秋,郑彦宁,杨 洋.制造业发明专利产业化效率的行业差异分析[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2016,31(12):55~61 |
| 制造业发明专利产业化效率的行业差异分析 |
| Study on Industrial Difference of Invention Patents’ Transfer Efficiency of Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises |
| 投稿时间：2016-11-20 修订日期：2016-11-20 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1009-8623.2016.12.011 |
| 中文关键词: 中国制造业；发明专利；技术等级；产业化效率；技术效率；规模效率 |
| 英文关键词: Chinese manufacturing enterprises;invention patent; technical grade; industrialization efficiency; technical efficiency; scale efficiency |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2346 |
| 全文下载次数: 1856 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 本文基于2000—2013年中国大中型制造业企业科技投入及产出数据，经过资本变量处理及价格指数平减，结合经济合作与发展组织（OECD）的产业技术分类标准，采用基于DEA的Malmquist指数分析方法，对我国制造业发明专利的产业化效率进行测度研究并进行行业差异分析。研究结论显示: 我国制造业发明专利的产业化效率呈现波动增长，年均增长率为0.7%，中低技术行业发明专利产业化效率相对较高。在结果分析的基础上，进一步研究规模效率、技术进步以及技术效率对产业化效率的影响，并提出有针对性的建议和对策。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Based on the input and output data of Chinese large-medium manufacturing enterprises during 2000—2013, this paper studies the dynamic changes of Chinese manufacturing enterprises in the Transfer Efficiency of Invention Patents (TEIP). We first cleanup the database by processing capital and investment variables, building price deflator indices, and categorizing manufacturing industries by OECD standard, and then calculate TEIP from the firm level in term of DEA-malmquist Index method. On the basis of the calculation, we further analyze the industrial difference of TEIP. We draw the following conclusions: On the whole, TEIP of Chinese manufacturing enterprises grows relatively instable, and average annual growth rate is about 0.7%. TEIP of medium-low-technology industry has the largest average annual growth rate. On the base of conclusions, we study how scale efficiency, technical progress and technical efficiency influence TEIP, and finally gives targeted recommendations. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
