| 周 恒.主要经济体人工智能全球治理诉求分化研究[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2025,40(7):68~76 |
| 主要经济体人工智能全球治理诉求分化研究 |
| Research of the Divergence of Global Governance Demands for Artificial Intelligence among Major Economies |
| 投稿时间：2025-04-23 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1009-8623.2025.07.009 |
| 中文关键词: 人工智能全球治理；双重博弈理论；获胜集合 |
| 英文关键词: global artificial intelligence governance; dual game theory; win-set |
| 基金项目:2025 年度湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会一般项目课题“数据财产权益确权手续制度研究”（XSP25YBC429）。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 14 |
| 全文下载次数: 18 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 随着人工智能技术的迅猛发展，全球主要经济体在人工智能全球治理中呈现明显的诉求分化。
基于双重博弈理论，能够帮助分析各国人工智能全球治理诉求的形成逻辑，预测中国人工智能产业发展
与相关治理诉求的冲突与调和可能性。研究发现，各经济体在人工智能全球治理的国际博弈中，其诉求
会受到国内利益集团博弈的影响，美国放松了对本国人工智能技术的管制，并主张限制对中国人工智能
技术产品的应用；欧洲国家注重保护本土数据权益，基于数据合规考量针对中国人工智能技术产品进
行规制；发展中国家关注人工智能技术带来的发展机遇，对中国人工智能技术产品普遍持欢迎态度。
基于上述发现，提出有针对性的中国应对策略。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, major economies around the
world are showing a clear divergence in their opinions for global AI governance. Based on dual-game theory, this
paper can help analyze the logic behind the formation of various countries’ opinions for global AI governance, and
predict the potential conflicts between the development of China’s AI industry and related global AI governance
opinions. This paper founds that the international governance opinions from various economies in global AI
governance issues are often influenced by the dynamics of domestic interest groups. The United States has
reduced regulations on its AI industry and advocated for restrictions on the use of Chinese AI products. European
countries focus on protecting domestic data rights and interests and are regulating Chinese AI products based on
data compliance considerations. Developing countries are concerned about the development opportunities brought
by AI technology and are generally welcoming of Chinese AI products. Based on these findings, China response
measures are proposed in this article. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
