| 虞 文,田文霞.中英社会科学成果评价比较研究[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2013,28(2):72~76 |
| 中英社会科学成果评价比较研究 |
| Comparison of Social Science Achievements EvaluationSystem Between China and the UK |
| 投稿时间：2012-12-26 修订日期：2012-12-26 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1009-8623.2013.02.011 |
| 中文关键词: 中国；英国；社会科学成果；定性评价；定量评价 |
| 英文关键词: China and the UK；social science achievements；qualitative evaluation；quantitative evaluation |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3403 |
| 全文下载次数: 2263 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 中、英两国社会科学成果的评价方法，有相似之处，也有不同之点。通过比较研究得出的结论是：中国的社会科学成果评价应该实行专业机构评价与同行专家评价相结合，科学设置考核周期和评价时限，灵活运用恰当的评价方式，摒弃简单粗略的评价方法；要深刻认识哲学社会科学研究与评价的复杂性，准确把握评价对象的不同特点，坚持同行评价和社会评价相协调、定性评价与定量评价相结合，增强评价结果的科学性与公信力。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The paper compared the similarity and difference of social science achievements evaluation system between China and the UK, and summarized characteristics and advantages of the British evaluation system. The article concludes that science achievements evaluation in China should combine professional institutions
evaluation with peer evaluation, set up a scientific assessment period and evaluation duration, in the meantime adopt a proper evaluation method instead of the simple and rough method. In consideration of complexity of social
science research, it should grasp the different characteristics of evaluation objects, coordinate the peer evaluation and social evaluation, and combine the qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation to ensure the rationality
and credibility of evaluation results. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
